<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Efficy Overflow Q&amp;A - Recent questions tagged merging</title>
<link>https://overflow.efficy.io/?qa=tag/merging</link>
<description>Powered by Question2Answer</description>
<item>
<title>Report of actions/visit to Word</title>
<link>https://overflow.efficy.io/?qa=4177/report-of-actions-visit-to-word</link>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Hello&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Is there a way to use the Report module to produce a docx document (based on a template) in order to generate a report showing all actions (visits) of the previous week ?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I think this is achievable using the campaign functions but it can be &quot;complicated&quot; for users to go through the different step.&lt;br&gt;
The report module seems to be able to do the job using Crystal Reports..but we haven't gone for this reporting solution - we went for Qlik...&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;One of the solution purchased by Efficy (Vente Partner) was doing this job very easily.&lt;br&gt;
Clicking on a customized button, a csv file was exported to the local PC and then a .dot word document was automaticaly opened. A vba code was automatically launching a merging using the csv data...et voilà, report of the done week for the sales manager !&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Any simple way to do something similar with Efficy ?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Patrice - MX France &lt;/p&gt;
</description>
<category>How to</category>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://overflow.efficy.io/?qa=4177/report-of-actions-visit-to-word</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2019 13:23:56 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>[2014] Full control access needed when merging doubles, why not 1 side instead of both?</title>
<link>https://overflow.efficy.io/?qa=1422/2014-full-control-access-needed-when-merging-doubles-instead</link>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Hi All,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The situation that my customer (Avoord Zorg en Wonen) needs:&lt;br&gt;
- There is a synchro with another system for contacts&lt;br&gt;
- When a contact is synced from this system, it is not deletable in Efficy anymore&lt;br&gt;
- Other contacts in Efficy (manually added) are on full control&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;When merging a duplicate, the one from the other system will stay and the manually entered one will be deleted.&lt;br&gt;
But the merge function checks if there is full control on BOTH, even though one will never be deleted.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Is a custom possible in the merge function so that only full control is needed for the record that will get deleted and read/write/secure on the one that will stay?&lt;br&gt;
(because this way we can sync the contacts from the other system with read/write/secure rights to make sure these do not get deleted by the users that have merge rights)&lt;br&gt;
Or is there another solution for this?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
<category>Efficy/ Client side</category>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://overflow.efficy.io/?qa=1422/2014-full-control-access-needed-when-merging-doubles-instead</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2016 09:34:47 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Duplicate - Preparing Merge - What Fields can we use in the DataGrid?</title>
<link>https://overflow.efficy.io/?qa=531/duplicate-preparing-merge-what-fields-can-use-the-datagrid</link>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Here is the list of Fields Available in the DataSet of the Workflow Trigger &quot;PrepareDuplicateMerge&quot;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;
  &lt;p&gt;Be careful the fields VALUE and VALUE2 are containing HTML and&lt;br&gt;
  JavaScript for some  fields.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt;FIELDNAME&lt;br&gt;
DETAIL&lt;br&gt;
DETAILKEY&lt;br&gt;
DETAILNAME&lt;br&gt;
DISPLAYORDER&lt;br&gt;
FIELDID&lt;br&gt;
FIELDINDEX&lt;br&gt;
FIELDLABEL&lt;br&gt;
SELECTED&lt;br&gt;
TABLEVIEWINDEX&lt;br&gt;
TOMERGE&lt;br&gt;
TYPEFLD&lt;br&gt;
LENGTH&lt;br&gt;
VALUE&lt;br&gt;
VALUE2&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
<category>WorkFlow / Serverscript</category>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://overflow.efficy.io/?qa=531/duplicate-preparing-merge-what-fields-can-use-the-datagrid</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2015 17:00:44 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>